HCOLL-318 added many documentation and examples; Empowerted ReplicableEntry interface, and changed Map/SetRemoteOperations contracts to allow implementing more agile reconciliation strategies

This commit is contained in:
leventov
2015-06-20 05:43:34 +03:00
parent 9746084998
commit 1d7f54635a
28 changed files with 4164 additions and 2862 deletions
@@ -2,7 +2,11 @@ package net.openhft.chronicle.hash;
import net.openhft.chronicle.hash.locks.InterProcessLock;
import net.openhft.chronicle.hash.locks.InterProcessReadWriteUpdateLock;
import net.openhft.chronicle.map.MapEntryOperations;
import net.openhft.chronicle.map.MapMethods;
import net.openhft.chronicle.map.MapQueryContext;
import net.openhft.chronicle.set.SetEntryOperations;
import net.openhft.chronicle.set.SetQueryContext;
/**
* Context of {@link ChronicleHash} operations with <i>individual keys</i>.
@@ -21,10 +25,11 @@ import net.openhft.chronicle.map.MapMethods;
* try (ExternalMapQueryContext<K, V, ?> q = map.queryContext(key)) {
* // q.entry(), checks if the entry is present in the map, and acquires
* // the read lock for that.
* if (q.entry() != null) {
* MapEntry<K, V> entry = q.entry();
* if (entry != null) {
* // Tries to acquire the write lock to perform modification,
* // but this is an illegal upgrade: read -> write, throws IllegalMonitorStateException
* q.remove(q.entry());
* q.remove(entry);
* }
* }}</pre>
* So, to workaround this, you should acquire the {@linkplain #updateLock() update lock},
@@ -33,9 +38,9 @@ import net.openhft.chronicle.map.MapMethods;
* // CORRECT
* try (ExternalMapQueryContext<K, V, ?> q = map.queryContext(key)) {
* q.updateLock().lock(); // acquire the update lock before checking the entry presence.
* if (q.entry() != null) {
* q.remove(q.entry());
* }
* MapEntry<K, V> entry = q.entry();
* if (entry != null)
* q.remove(entry);
* }}</pre>
* </li>
* <li>You want to try to acquire some lock heuristically, in order to improve total {@code
@@ -46,14 +51,14 @@ import net.openhft.chronicle.map.MapMethods;
* // For acquireUsing(), it is assumed to be very probable, that the entry is already
* // present in the map, so we will perform the whole acquireUsing() without exclusive locking
* if (q.readLock().tryLock()) {
* MapEntry<?, V> entry = q.entry();
* MapEntry<K, V> entry = q.entry();
* if (entry != null) {
* // Entry is present, return
* returnValue.returnValue(entry.value());
* return;
* }
* // Key is absent
* // Need to unlock, to lock to update lock later. Direct updrage is forbidden.
* // Need to unlock, to lock to update lock later. Direct upgrade is forbidden.
* q.readLock().unlock();
* }
* // We are here, either if we:
@@ -63,7 +68,7 @@ import net.openhft.chronicle.map.MapMethods;
* // 2) Seen the entry is absent under the read lock. This means we need to insert
* // the default value into the map. that requires update-level access as well
* q.updateLock().lock();
* MapEntry<?, V> entry = q.entry();
* MapEntry<K, V> entry = q.entry();
* if (entry != null) {
* // Entry is present, return
* returnValue.returnValue(entry.value());
@@ -74,7 +79,7 @@ import net.openhft.chronicle.map.MapMethods;
* returnValue.returnValue(q.entry().value());
* }}</pre></li>
* <li>If the default {@link InterProcessLock#lock()} policy of trying to acquire the
* lock for some time, and then throw {@code RuntimeException}, or need custom timeout:
* lock for some time, and then throw {@code RuntimeException}, or need a custom timeout:
* <pre>{@code
* try (ExternalHashQueryContext<K> q = hash.queryContext(key)) {
* if (q.writeLock().tryLock(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS)) {
@@ -84,9 +89,53 @@ import net.openhft.chronicle.map.MapMethods;
* }
* }}</pre></li>
* </ul>
*
* <p>{@code HashQueryContext} defines the common pattern for working with {@code ChronicleHash}
* contexts: it has a pair of methods, {@link #entry()} and {@link #absentEntry()}, at any moment
* one of them returns an (absent) entry context object, another - {@code null}, depending on the
* presence of the {@linkplain #queriedKey() queried key} in the {@code ChronicleHash}. Thus,
* block of code that uses {@code HashQueryContext} usually has an if-else statement,
* with "then" branch for dealing with the present entry, {@code else} branch for dealing with
* the absent entry, or vise-versa. For example: <pre>{@code
* interface Point {
* double getX();
* void setX(double x);
* double addX(double xAdd);
*
* double getY();
* void setY(double y);
* double addY(double yAdd);
* }
*
* <K> Point movePoint(ChronicleMap<K, Point> map, K key, double xMove, double yMove,
* Point using) {
* // Moves existing point by [xMove, yMove], if absent - assumes the default point is [0, 0].
* // Returns the resulting point
* try (ExternalMapQueryContext<K, Point, ?> q = map.queryContext(key)) {
* Point offHeapPoint;
* q.updateLock().lock();
* MapEntry<K, Point> entry = q.entry();
* if (entry != null) {
* // Key is present
* offHeapPoint = entry.value().getUsing(using);
* } else {
* // Key is absent
* q.insert(q.absentEntry(), q.defaultValue(q.absentEntry()));
* offHeapPoint = q.entry().value().getUsing(using);
* }
* offHeapPoint.addX(xMove);
* offHeapPoint.addY(yMove);
* return offHeapPoint;
* }
* }}</pre>
*
* <p>{@code HashQueryContext} is the base interface defining the structure, but it has no methods
* to anything "interesting" with {@code entry()} or {@code absentEntry()}. Use {@link
* MapQueryContext} or {@link SetQueryContext} interfaces, which provide access to {@link
* MapEntryOperations} and {@link SetEntryOperations} respectively.
*
* @param <K> the hash key type
* @see ChronicleHash#queryContext(Object)
* @see ChronicleHash#queryContext(Object)
*/
public interface HashQueryContext<K> extends HashContext<K>, InterProcessReadWriteUpdateLock {