From b73f2b60580f6736ae5caae5e3caf0dd06fdb19b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rob Austin <rob.austin@boundedbuffer.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:04:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fixed typo

---
 .../java/net/openhft/chronicle/hash/locks/InterProcessLock.java | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/main/java/net/openhft/chronicle/hash/locks/InterProcessLock.java b/src/main/java/net/openhft/chronicle/hash/locks/InterProcessLock.java
index c924eca78..ad82e9677 100644
--- a/src/main/java/net/openhft/chronicle/hash/locks/InterProcessLock.java
+++ b/src/main/java/net/openhft/chronicle/hash/locks/InterProcessLock.java
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock;
 /**
  * Abstracts inter-process lock of {@link ChronicleHash} data: segments, entries.
  *
- * <p>This lock is not reentrant, but kind of "saturating": multiple {@link #lock()} calls has
+ * <p>This lock is not reentrant, but kind of "saturating": multiple {@link #lock()} calls have
  * the same effect as a single call. Likewise {@link #unlock()} -- multiple unlocks, or "unlocking"
  * when the lock isn't actually held, has no negative effects.
  *